Trending...
- Creative Investment Research Analysis Finds Slower GDP Growth, Rising Inflation
- Tru by Hilton El Paso Airport Opens to Guests
- TechHouse Earns Highly Selective Microsoft Support Badge
Will Nevada's Highest Court Confront Corruption—Or Allow It to Continue?
LAS VEGAS - PennZone -- Source: The Verity Project
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on The PennZone
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on The PennZone
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
- Forged financial account documents and unopposed motions for trustee removal, accounting, criminal fraud, and elder abuse.
- Allegations of perjury and false police reports by opposing parties,
- Tampering with electronic court service systems and docket manipulation,
- Improper distribution of over $1 million in trust assets in direct violation of the trust's provisions.
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on The PennZone
- Brosix Celebrates 20 Years of Private Team Messaging for Small and Mid-Sized Businesses
- Top 15 Mosquito-Infested Cities in Louisiana and East Texas Ranked for 2026 Mosquito Season
- Colonial Nissan Enhances Ownership Experience with Hall of Fame Package
- From Broken to Soaring Week 40
- Costa Oil Takes the Spotlight as Primary Sponsor at Pocono, Celebrates Team with Employee Appreciation Day Costa Oil to back the
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on The PennZone
- MoMojo Records announces new album from Mitch Woods
- Finnish Political Satire Film Generates 10,000+ Cross-Platform Interactions Following Gandalf Parody Video Across TikTok, YouTube and Telegram
- Baikal Engineers Published in ASHRAE Journal on Site-Assembled Custom AHUs
- AI Is Making It Easier for API-First Platforms to Connect, Partner, Reach Customers, and Grow Revenue Faster
- 2026 Editorial Freelancers Association Conference Focuses on Building Sustainable Careers
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Source: The Verity Project
0 Comments
Latest on The PennZone
- Honesdale Painters Launch Season With Act of Community Kindness
- Tuckwell Machinery Launches New Range of Woodworking Machinery
- A Brave Little Hero with Four Paws
- Pittsburgh-Area Author Erica L. Day Releases HER, a Christian Second-Chance Romance and Its Own Comp
- Revenue Optics Expands Its Private Equity Practice as Sponsors Move Inside Sales to the Center of Distribution Value Creation
- Ecuador Freedom Launches First Scheduled Motorcycle Tour of Northern Peru's Lost Kingdoms
- Lineus Medical Completes Financial Restructuring with KMF Investments- Launching a New Era for SafeBreak
- Neuro Recovery Institute Showcases Emerging Immersive Neuro-Rehabilitation Technology at Clinical Innovation Open House
- Community, Conservation & Waterwise Inspiration Bloom on June 6
- Industrial and systems engineers celebrate key leaders in the field at IISE Annual Conference
- Cosanostra Miami Rises as the Best Latin Nightclub in Miami in Under Two Years From its Opening
- CCHR Leader's 50-Year Fight for Psychiatric Drug Victims Gains National Momentum
- Endless Mountain Music Festival Celebrates 21st Season with America250-Inspired Lineup
- Author Releases 7-Day Screen Time Reset for Families as Teachers Worldwide Report Children "Struggling to Grasp Basic Concepts"
- Men's Health Month Begins with Record Proclamations, AP News Coverage, & National Momentum for Men's Health
- Blueshirt Media Launches HIPAA-Compliant AI Call Answering for Addiction Treatment Centers
- AdvisorVault Adds Social Media Archiving to its Consolidated D3P Service
- UK Financial Ltd Audits Full Ethereum Architecture Verifies Corporate Wallets and 19-Token Ecosystem Ahead of CoinMarketCap Filing for Global Ranking
- Creative Investment Research Analysis Finds Slower GDP Growth, Rising Inflation
- TechHouse Earns Highly Selective Microsoft Support Badge
