Trending...
- Shoutout Joseph Neibich aka Nybyk
- Red5 Taps PubNub to Power the Next Era of Real-Time Interactive Streaming
- NYC Composer/Educator Launches Debut Children's Book to Fantastic Reviews
YREKA, Calif. - PennZone -- In a certified letter delivered to Return To Freedom, Inc. ('RTF') and it's board of directors on September 16, 2019, key wild horse and burro advocates demanded that Return To Freedom, a 501-C-3 non-profit, immediately withdraw its support of the so-called proposal titled; 'The Path Forward For Management Of BLM's Wild Horses & Burros' ('Proposal') [1].
On August 28th 2019, naturalist William E. Simpson II had a phone call with the Executive Director of the Public Lands Council, Mr. Ethan Lane. In that telephone call, Mr. Lane alluded to Mr. Simpson that via RTF's support of the Proposal, he arguably had the needed majority of all wild horse and burro advocates to support the Proposal's acceptance by Congress. This is tantamount to an admission that, without the support of Return To Freedom, the livestock industry's surrogates (BLM, HSUS, ASPCA, AMF, etc.) would have to go back to the drawing board.
A majority of wild horse advocates and organizations, including Friends of Animals ('FOA') feel that the current Proposal as written is seriously flawed and would likely lead to the final extinction of native species American wild horses and burros in America. This Proposal is particularly troubling given there is a superior alternative plan for managing wild horses and burros called 'Wild Horse Fire Brigade', which offers savings to taxpayers using an ecologically sound method for rewilding BLM and USFS wild horses and burros [2].
There is more than enough existing and new science, as well as decades of empirical experience, that argues compellingly against the flawed precepts upon which the Proposal RTF supports is built.
The current Proposal posits are premised upon known misinformation, including those found in four key precepts of the Proposal, each followed by a brief counterpoint made by experts who oppose the current Proposal:
Proposal: Conduct targeted gathers and removals at densely populated Herd Management Areas (HMAs) to reduce herd size and make progress towards AML."
Counterpoint: This has been done unsuccessfully for decades and is by all accounts a draconian methodology only made necessary due to the large-scale decimation of the evolutionary predators of wild horses and burros, namely, mountain lions, bears, wolves and coyotes.
More on The PennZone
Proposal: Treat gathered horses and burros with population growth suppression tools prior to being returned to the range. Reversible methods must be administered to an appropriate percentage of mares (generally close to 90%) to control populations, with some flexibility depending on modeling of range and herd parameters."
Counterpoint: The latest science proves that the use of chemical contraceptives in equids leads to the breakdown of critical social structures in family bands of wild horses as well as resulting in varied degrees of sterilization and erosion of genetic viability.
Proposal: Relocate horses and burros in holding facilities, and those taken off the range, to large cost-effective humane pasture facilities funded through public-private partnerships."
Counterpoint: Here again, this has been an ongoing expensive failure that will continue to burden taxpayers.
Proposal: Promote adoptions in order to help reduce captive populations and costs. The BLM is currently spending $2,250 ($3,250 with incentive) per adopted horse to promote adoptions that ultimately provide considerable cost savings to the agency. Investing in the adoption process for each horse will reduce or eliminate the estimated $46,000 per horse expenditure in off range holding over the course of their lifetime."
Counterpoint: Another paradigm that has proven relatively ineffective as evidenced by tens of thousands of wild horses and burros that nevertheless end up in off-range facilities at great ongoing cost to taxpayers. Even though a small percentage of native species American wild horses can be successfully gentled and thereby 'domesticated,' management of wildlife in this manner is costly and very limited in its scope and effect as any genuine solution.
Leading independent wild burro and horse advocates are of the opinion that if RTF rescinds support of the existing Proposal, it could then be amended to include what are arguably the minimal components to assure a future representation of free-roaming native species American wild horses and burros in carefully selected remote wilderness areas in America where the presence of a proper proportion of the evolved apex predators of equids will certainly control equid populations [3].
More on The PennZone
The 3 minimal components are:
1) Current management practices amount to an egregious misuse of the WHBA. Not only must helicopter roundups come to an immediate end, BLM and the USFS must provide greater protections to wild equids in existing HMAs by reevaluating HMA boundaries and AMLs, giving priority to wild equids over any human use of these public lands. These agencies also currently ignore any benefit wild equids have on the lands they currently occupy, including the potential to lower the risk of wildfire in the grasslands occupied by wild equids. Congress must ensure that wild equids and their benefits are given more weight in establishing HMA boundaries and AMLs.
2) All wild equids that are rounded up after considerations in no. 1 will be transported, families intact, unmolested (no treatments with any chemicals or castration of stallions) into carefully selected and appropriately remote wilderness areas. Where possible, such equids can also be used to establish larger AMLs on existing HMAs (or expanded HMAs) where such populations would benefit the grassland habitats.
3) A percentage (TBD) of 10-year old (and younger) wild horses and burros held in off range captivity will be rewilded into carefully selected and appropriately remote wilderness areas.
The following *advocates were signatories on the letter to RTF.
*Friends of Animals (https://www.friendsofanimals.org/about-us/)
*Board of Directors Coyote Canyon Caballos d'Anza Inc 501 c 3 - Kathleen Hayden, Secretary
*Carla Bowers
*Lorna Moffat
* Darice Massey
* Dr. Sharon Greenleaf La Pierre - Red Raven Farms - Colorado & Kentucky
*Speak Up For Horses
*Jeff Hudson
*William E. Simpson II – Naturalist / Rancher
[1] https://www.energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=0869B02B-E9C5-4F0B-9AE8-9A8A1C85293E
[2] www.WHFB.us
[3] Impact Of Wild Horses On Wilderness Landscape And Wildfire - Preliminary Findings Report - By: William E. Simpson II -Naturalist - July 25, 2019 (https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/6a30c6_98642a78546849f0a94e2687cdf35654.pdf)
On August 28th 2019, naturalist William E. Simpson II had a phone call with the Executive Director of the Public Lands Council, Mr. Ethan Lane. In that telephone call, Mr. Lane alluded to Mr. Simpson that via RTF's support of the Proposal, he arguably had the needed majority of all wild horse and burro advocates to support the Proposal's acceptance by Congress. This is tantamount to an admission that, without the support of Return To Freedom, the livestock industry's surrogates (BLM, HSUS, ASPCA, AMF, etc.) would have to go back to the drawing board.
A majority of wild horse advocates and organizations, including Friends of Animals ('FOA') feel that the current Proposal as written is seriously flawed and would likely lead to the final extinction of native species American wild horses and burros in America. This Proposal is particularly troubling given there is a superior alternative plan for managing wild horses and burros called 'Wild Horse Fire Brigade', which offers savings to taxpayers using an ecologically sound method for rewilding BLM and USFS wild horses and burros [2].
There is more than enough existing and new science, as well as decades of empirical experience, that argues compellingly against the flawed precepts upon which the Proposal RTF supports is built.
The current Proposal posits are premised upon known misinformation, including those found in four key precepts of the Proposal, each followed by a brief counterpoint made by experts who oppose the current Proposal:
Proposal: Conduct targeted gathers and removals at densely populated Herd Management Areas (HMAs) to reduce herd size and make progress towards AML."
Counterpoint: This has been done unsuccessfully for decades and is by all accounts a draconian methodology only made necessary due to the large-scale decimation of the evolutionary predators of wild horses and burros, namely, mountain lions, bears, wolves and coyotes.
More on The PennZone
- GDE Tree Services Expands Operations into Sydney, NSW
- Tuckwell Machinery Expands CNC Range to Support Australian Cabinet Makers
- The Inner Power of Emotional Self-Leadership
- Dr. Nadene Rose Shares the Secret to True Success: Faith, Obedience, and Divine Purpose
- Best Companies Group Opens Free Registration for Best Places to Work in Insurance Program
Proposal: Treat gathered horses and burros with population growth suppression tools prior to being returned to the range. Reversible methods must be administered to an appropriate percentage of mares (generally close to 90%) to control populations, with some flexibility depending on modeling of range and herd parameters."
Counterpoint: The latest science proves that the use of chemical contraceptives in equids leads to the breakdown of critical social structures in family bands of wild horses as well as resulting in varied degrees of sterilization and erosion of genetic viability.
Proposal: Relocate horses and burros in holding facilities, and those taken off the range, to large cost-effective humane pasture facilities funded through public-private partnerships."
Counterpoint: Here again, this has been an ongoing expensive failure that will continue to burden taxpayers.
Proposal: Promote adoptions in order to help reduce captive populations and costs. The BLM is currently spending $2,250 ($3,250 with incentive) per adopted horse to promote adoptions that ultimately provide considerable cost savings to the agency. Investing in the adoption process for each horse will reduce or eliminate the estimated $46,000 per horse expenditure in off range holding over the course of their lifetime."
Counterpoint: Another paradigm that has proven relatively ineffective as evidenced by tens of thousands of wild horses and burros that nevertheless end up in off-range facilities at great ongoing cost to taxpayers. Even though a small percentage of native species American wild horses can be successfully gentled and thereby 'domesticated,' management of wildlife in this manner is costly and very limited in its scope and effect as any genuine solution.
Leading independent wild burro and horse advocates are of the opinion that if RTF rescinds support of the existing Proposal, it could then be amended to include what are arguably the minimal components to assure a future representation of free-roaming native species American wild horses and burros in carefully selected remote wilderness areas in America where the presence of a proper proportion of the evolved apex predators of equids will certainly control equid populations [3].
More on The PennZone
- Understanding Unexpected Death: Why Independent Autopsies Matter in Cases Without Clear Cause
- Epic Pictures Group Sets North American Release Date for the Thriller NO ORDINARY HEIST
- Mobile Copywriter Celebrates 13 Years of Content Creation and SEO Services
- Award-Winning REALTOR® Paige Coker Joins Corcoran DeRonja Real Estate
- Over 98% of crypto owners globally don't declare taxes, new report find
The 3 minimal components are:
1) Current management practices amount to an egregious misuse of the WHBA. Not only must helicopter roundups come to an immediate end, BLM and the USFS must provide greater protections to wild equids in existing HMAs by reevaluating HMA boundaries and AMLs, giving priority to wild equids over any human use of these public lands. These agencies also currently ignore any benefit wild equids have on the lands they currently occupy, including the potential to lower the risk of wildfire in the grasslands occupied by wild equids. Congress must ensure that wild equids and their benefits are given more weight in establishing HMA boundaries and AMLs.
2) All wild equids that are rounded up after considerations in no. 1 will be transported, families intact, unmolested (no treatments with any chemicals or castration of stallions) into carefully selected and appropriately remote wilderness areas. Where possible, such equids can also be used to establish larger AMLs on existing HMAs (or expanded HMAs) where such populations would benefit the grassland habitats.
3) A percentage (TBD) of 10-year old (and younger) wild horses and burros held in off range captivity will be rewilded into carefully selected and appropriately remote wilderness areas.
The following *advocates were signatories on the letter to RTF.
*Friends of Animals (https://www.friendsofanimals.org/about-us/)
*Board of Directors Coyote Canyon Caballos d'Anza Inc 501 c 3 - Kathleen Hayden, Secretary
*Carla Bowers
*Lorna Moffat
* Darice Massey
* Dr. Sharon Greenleaf La Pierre - Red Raven Farms - Colorado & Kentucky
*Speak Up For Horses
*Jeff Hudson
*William E. Simpson II – Naturalist / Rancher
[1] https://www.energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=0869B02B-E9C5-4F0B-9AE8-9A8A1C85293E
[2] www.WHFB.us
[3] Impact Of Wild Horses On Wilderness Landscape And Wildfire - Preliminary Findings Report - By: William E. Simpson II -Naturalist - July 25, 2019 (https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/6a30c6_98642a78546849f0a94e2687cdf35654.pdf)
Source: Wild Horse Fire Brigade
0 Comments
Latest on The PennZone
- EFA Announces 2026 Editorial Rate Chart
- Red5 Taps PubNub to Power the Next Era of Real-Time Interactive Streaming
- Shoutout Joseph Neibich aka Nybyk
- Meet Joseph Neibich aka Joseph Nybyk of Beachwood Canyon
- LARUS Launches Business Continuity Framework for IPv4-Dependent Networks
- KeysCaribbean Offers 'Skip-the-Crowds' Savings With 15 Percent Off April Stays
- Supply & Demand Chain Executive Names Puga Sankara as Recipient of 2026 Pros to Know Award
- Why We're Holding the Line on Pricing
- Moravian Academy Announces New Full-Tuition Impact Scholarship for Upper School Students
- AI Disruption Meets Marine Scale: Off The Hook YS, Inc. (N Y S E American: OTH) Targets Breakout Growth with NextBoat Launch and Aggressive Expansion
- Targeting the Billion-Dollar U.S. Countermeasure Market With AI-Driven Biodefense Platform: Lunai Bioworks (N A S D A Q: LNAI)
- National Focus Turns to Global Conflict, Families of Veterans Lost to Suicide Call for Recognition
- New Global Standard for Transparency Across Critical Resources and Energy Markets: SMX (Security Matters) PLC (N A S D A Q: SMX)
- Forced Psychiatric Hospitalization Fails Vulnerable People: CCHR Urges Repeal Amid Rising U.S. Policies
- Surging Into High-Performance AI With $AMD Partnership, Patent Expansion, and Strengthened Balance Sheet: Avalon GloboCare Corp. (N A S D A Q: ALBT)
- ATTAIN Profiles the Invisible Billionaire Who Started With $75 and Died the Richest Man in A
- Kiko Nation Launches Mobile App to Modernize Livestock Management and Digital Animal Registry
- NEW MANAGEMENT BOOK: Creating a Joy-Centric Culture
- QuickTrack by Datalex Transforms Retail Promoter Management with Claude AI and Real-Time Insights
- Kaltra Introduces Seasonal Discounts on Replacement Coils for Carrier, York, and Trane Chillers